Tristan Mccormick vs Noah Zamora Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Nov at 06:23 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Mccormick vs N. Zamora

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mccormick 1 - 0 Zamora
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tristan Mccormick winning 2 and Noah Zamora winning 0. The last match between Tristan Mccormick and Noah Zamora was at the M15 Orlando, 04-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tristan Mccormick getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mccormick | 1 |
| Zamora | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Orlando(11-04-25)
T. Mccormick vs N. Zamora H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.82% (139-110) | Career Total W/L | 52.73% (29-26) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Mccormick vs N. Zamora Match Preview:
- Tristan Mccormick has a slight advantage in second serve performance, winning 47.54% of points compared to Noah Zamora's 45.54%. Does this edge significantly impact match outcomes? It often correlates with match prediction accuracy.
- Noah Zamora leads in returning second serves, winning 45.10% of points against 44.09% for Tristan Mccormick. Is this advantage enough to alter the match's dynamic? It can be pivotal given its strong correlation with match outcomes.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Noah Zamora outperforms with a 31.94% success rate, while Tristan Mccormick manages 25.35%. This is a critical stat often used to predict head-to-head matchups.
- Under pressure, both players are fairly close in saving breakpoints, with Noah Zamora slightly ahead at 60.66% as opposed to Tristan Mccormick's 59.52%. How crucial is this stat for in-game predictions? It can tip the scales during crucial moments.
- In match performance over the past year, Noah Zamora holds an advantage with a 56.52% match win rate compared to Tristan Mccormick's 53.85%.
- Tristan Mccormick shines on Grass surfaces with a 67% win rate, while Noah Zamora excels on Indoor Hard with the same percentage. How does surface preference influence their performance? It can be decisive depending on the match conditions.
- Both players primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K. However, Tristan Mccormick has a slightly better win rate at 58.82% compared to Noah Zamora's 56.52%.
- Considering opponent quality, Noah Zamora has faced stronger competitors with an average rank of 253.65 against Tristan Mccormick's 439.29 over the last 12 months. Does facing tougher opponents sharpen a player's skill? It often indicates a higher level of resilience and adaptability.
- In deciding sets over the past year, Tristan Mccormick has a slight edge, winning 51% compared to Noah Zamora's 45%.
- Current event statistics and specific event performance should also be examined as they can reveal additional advantages.
Editorial Prediction (November 4, 2025, UTC):
This forthcoming match poses an intriguing contest between Tristan Mccormick and Noah Zamora. While their statistical profiles reveal a close competition in many areas, several key metrics suggest one player may have a slight edge.
Tristan Mccormick demonstrates superior performance on second serves and performs better in deciding sets, giving him a subtle but noteworthy advantage. Conversely, Noah Zamora excels in critical areas such as returning first serves and holding a stronger match win percentage over the last year.
Despite playing against tougher opponents, Noah Zamora has managed to maintain competitive performance levels, which might provide him with the upper hand in resilience and adaptability on the court.
Thus, with these factors in mind, Noah Zamora is slightly favored to win this upcoming matchup, assuming he leverages his strengths effectively throughout the match.
Tristan Mccormick vs Noah Zamora Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Mccormick vs N. Zamora H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:48:30 | Average Match Time | 1:48:30 |
| 48% (26/54) | 1st Serve % | 52% (35/67) |
| 77% (20/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (20/35) |
| 68% (19/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (18/32) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 43% (29/67) | Return Points Win % | 28% (15/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Mccormick Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | ||
N. Zamora Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 4-6 6-4 7-6(7) | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(2) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 5-7 6-3 10-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 7-6(4) 10-5 | ||

T. Mccormick vs N. Zamora Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.82% (139/110) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.73% (29/26) |
| 54.55% (318/265) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.08% (69/61) |
| 51.85% (2982/2769) | Games Win/Loss | 50.08% (652/650) |
| 54.00% (54/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.19% (25/22) |
| 57.02% (65/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 56.25% (18/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.55 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1532 | Aces Total | 95 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 896 | Total Double Faults | 36 |
| 1:43:45 | Average Match Time | 1:3:20 |
| 459.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 357.65 |
| 59% (9153/15481) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1178/2040) |
| 74% (6751/9153) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (758/1178) |
| 51% (3205/6329) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (439/862) |
| 38% (540/1417) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (82/201) |
| 37% (5904/15896) | Return Points Win % | 40% (803/2019) |
| 41.67% (25/35) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 60.32% (114/75) | Futures W/L | 52.83% (28/25) |
| 56% (138/246) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (29/55) |
| 54% (57/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 69% (11/16) |
| 55% (48/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 84% (134/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 72% (29/21) |
| 16% (134/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 28% (29/8) |
| 23% (115/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (26/8) |